Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:17:40 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Summit support for 2.5 [0/4] |
| |
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 02:06:15PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> I will invest some serious effort and time in cleanup after the feature freeze, > >> including investigating using the subarch support which I know some people > >> would like to see done. > > > > Any reason why most of these changes couldn't be moved to the subarch > > code now? > > 1. Time > 2. It'd make the patches much bigger and harder to read. > > I *will* do that. Just not in time for the freeze. IMHO, that's a cleanup (and yes, > a needed one).
Hm, IMVHO I think this should be done correctly, as a subarch, instead of just patches (although your patches are split up very nicely, good job, that couldn't have been very easy.) I don't know if "Time" is a good excuse to put things like this in the tree, in the format that it shouldn't be.
But as I'm not the i386 maintainer, I'll let Linus decide that one :)
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |