[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] USAGI IPsec
    On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:41:37AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:

    > Also the idea Alexey and I have to move towards a small
    > efficient flow cache shared by IPv4/IPv6 plays into this
    > as well. There are changesets on their way to Linus tonight

    Some people on #lartc were wondering about the use of a route cache if there
    is only one route. It was reported that a single default route on a system
    that talks to many destinations would lead to a huge route cache, which is
    probably not more efficient than looking up the simple route.

    Would this 'small efficient flow cache' also solve this problem?

    Or is this problem a figment of people's imaginations?

    > The initial ipsec is intended to be simple, singly linked
    > lists for the spd/sad databases etc. Making the feature
    > freeze is pretty important right now, full blown flow cache
    > is just performance improvement :)

    I know a lot of people are hoping that you make the feature freeze. As said
    before, if there is any help you need, just yell.



    -- Versatile DNS Software & Services the dot in .tk Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.022 / U:13.912 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site