lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Linux-streams] Re: [PATCH] Re: export of sys_call_tabl
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" wrote:
> Is you concern that LiS
> using a _GPL only facility will force GPL on modules linked with LiS
> even though LiS is LGPL?

No, my concern is that the kernel should be marked as
tainted when appropriate, thus giving volunteer kernel
hackers a change to decide if they want to help with an
oops from a tainted kernel.

For well-defined fundamental interfaces between genuinely
seperate works, I think using EXPORT_SYMBOL is more
appropriate than EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
Syscalls like putpmsg and getpmsg fall into this category,
even if wrapped in a thin layer to facilitate MP-safe
registration and deregistration.

The simple act of a LGPL module hooking two syscalls not
implemented by the standard kernel is IMHO no good reason
for marking the kernel as such tainted.

Best Regards,

Ole Husgaard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.037 / U:7.752 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site