lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] EVMS core (3/9) discover.c
    From
    Date

    On 10/10/2002 at 05:19 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:

    > > We plan to register a "__this_module.can_unload()" that
    > > should prevent plugin modules from unloading during
    > > discovery.

    > Ok in this case. But how about when you search that list later after
    > discovery for some reason and drop the lock. Then you could race with
    someone
    > else removing the plugin inbetween, no ?

    The only time the lock is released while actively
    searching the list is during discovery and direct
    ioctl communication. So yes, you are correct, the
    can_unload() would have to take both operations
    into account. All other list operations take
    place completely inside the lock. All in-use
    plugins are kept from unloading by module ref
    counts. Outside of the scope of the discover and
    direct ioctl operations, any unused plugins
    should be safe to unload.

    Is something being missed?

    Mark


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.021 / U:30.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site