[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] Workqueue Abstraction, 2.5.40-H7

On 1 Oct 2002, Jes Sorensen wrote:

> The point here is that it probably makes the code easier for you to
> read, but it makes it harder for a lot of other people since it's
> inconsistent with the standard. [...]

i began the whole line of argument with this sentence:

> *If* the consistent convention were to use the _t postfix for complex
> 'derived' types, it would create more compact and more readable kernel
> code.


> I agree that consistency is more important than having the absolute best
> rules, [...]

so i think we are in violent agreement regarding consistency.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean