[lkml]   [2002]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] Workqueue Abstraction, 2.5.40-H7

    On 1 Oct 2002, Jes Sorensen wrote:

    > The point here is that it probably makes the code easier for you to
    > read, but it makes it harder for a lot of other people since it's
    > inconsistent with the standard. [...]

    i began the whole line of argument with this sentence:

    > *If* the consistent convention were to use the _t postfix for complex
    > 'derived' types, it would create more compact and more readable kernel
    > code.


    > I agree that consistency is more important than having the absolute best
    > rules, [...]

    so i think we are in violent agreement regarding consistency.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.018 / U:74.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site