Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Oct 2002 22:38:53 +0400 | From | Oleg Drokin <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.5.39 |
| |
Hello!
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:19:36PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > > @@ -863,6 +863,7 @@ > > return(-EFAULT); > > return(0); > > } > > + return -ENOTTY; > > } > I did a check of some of the other block drivers, and they mostly seem to > do -EINVAL rather than -ENOTTY. There was an oddball -ENOSYS, but I guess > I'll stick with -EINVAL.
Well, it can be both ways (EINVAL and ENOTTY). Probably EINVAL is more close in this case, though. I'll send the stacktraces tomorrow, when I'll get to work.
Bye, Oleg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |