Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:04:42 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: 2.4 mm trouble [possible lru race] |
| |
On Tue, Oct 01 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 19:31, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 18:56, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 16:20, Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de wrote: > > > > > > no preempt or anything fancy, m68k vanila 2.4.19 (well almost). > > > > > > > > > > Vanilla would be CONFIG_SMP=y, is that what you have? > > > > > > > > Somehow I doubt Linux supports m68k SMP machines ;) > > > > > > CONFIG_SMP=y works perfectly well on single cpu machines - it forces > > > the spinlocks to actually exist. It's not supposed to change any > > > behaviour, but you never know. Behaviour is obviously changing here. > > > > Again, m68k was the target. > > Sure fine, no good reason to be cryptic about it though. > > #error "m68k doesn't do SMP yet" > > So SMP must be off or the compile would abort. Well, the only interesting
There's no CONFIG_SMP in the m68k arch config.in. Anyways, enough beating of dead horse :)
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |