[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: can we make anonymous memory non-EXECUTABLE?
On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 03:11:22AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > One way to do this would be to create a newbrk() syscall which takes a
> > permission argument (for new pages.)
> brk(), mmap().
> Welcome to libc 8)

Umm. How can libc implement mmap without the kernel
handing out the pages? I don't get it.


Erik B. Andersen
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.120 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site