[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] klibc requirements
On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> Thus spake Greg KH (
> > > > - portable, runs on all platforms that the kernel currently
> > > > works on, but doesn't have to run on any non-Linux based OS.
> > You didn't address this. What are the future plans of porting dietLibc
> > to the platforms that are not currently supported by it (but are by
> > Linux)?
> We will attempt to port the diet libc to every Linux platform that we
> have access to. I won't go out and buy hardware to port my software to,
> so if anyone needs the diet libc ported somewhere, I need an account on
> a test box somewhere.
> We are currently missing sh-linux, ia64-linux and m68k-linux and
> probably a few architectures that I have never heard of ;)

uClibc runs on both sh and ,68k, so the only arch missing
coverage with either dietlibc or uClibc seems to be ia64.


Erik B. Andersen
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.206 / U:3.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site