Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:51:26 -0700 | From | Erik Andersen <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] klibc requirements |
| |
On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 03:15:14PM +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote: > Thus spake Greg KH (greg@kroah.com): > > > > - portable, runs on all platforms that the kernel currently > > > > works on, but doesn't have to run on any non-Linux based OS. > > You didn't address this. What are the future plans of porting dietLibc > > to the platforms that are not currently supported by it (but are by > > Linux)? > > We will attempt to port the diet libc to every Linux platform that we > have access to. I won't go out and buy hardware to port my software to, > so if anyone needs the diet libc ported somewhere, I need an account on > a test box somewhere. > > We are currently missing sh-linux, ia64-linux and m68k-linux and > probably a few architectures that I have never heard of ;)
uClibc runs on both sh and ,68k, so the only arch missing coverage with either dietlibc or uClibc seems to be ia64.
-Erik
-- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |