lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] klibc requirements
    On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 02:23:46PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
    > I can think of that in a fast thought:
    >
    > - if fsck.* can be there, it will make fs nice, just now they have to
    > be able to fsck a ro root fs.

    That would be a nice addition.

    > - I suppose that you can put here also the raid autodetect code and
    > things like that.
    > - you also need a very small minishell, something like nash (that
    > cames with mkinitrd will suffice).

    busybox lash
    http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb/busybox/shell/lash.c?rev=1.142&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
    or busybox msh or busybox ash if you need something thats
    all posix compliant.

    > - as I suppose that you have supposed insmod is essential :)

    busybox insmod

    > - you already put there IP autoconfiguration.

    udhcp

    -Erik

    --
    Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
    --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.027 / U:0.652 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site