Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Jan 2002 07:57:23 -0700 | From | Erik Andersen <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] klibc requirements |
| |
On Wed Jan 09, 2002 at 02:23:46PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > I can think of that in a fast thought: > > - if fsck.* can be there, it will make fs nice, just now they have to > be able to fsck a ro root fs.
That would be a nice addition.
> - I suppose that you can put here also the raid autodetect code and > things like that. > - you also need a very small minishell, something like nash (that > cames with mkinitrd will suffice).
busybox lash http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/cvsweb/busybox/shell/lash.c?rev=1.142&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup or busybox msh or busybox ash if you need something thats all posix compliant.
> - as I suppose that you have supposed insmod is essential :)
busybox insmod
> - you already put there IP autoconfiguration.
udhcp
-Erik
-- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |