Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:44:53 +0100 | From | "'jtv'" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix |
| |
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:44:59AM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote: > > NO; the standard here is clear: any access to a volatile object is a side > effect (see , and optimization is NOT allowed to eliminate side effects, and > must do them respecting sequence points, even if it determines that the code > will in fact do nothing
Thank you. That makes it absolutely clear.
Jeroen
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |