Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix | From | Gabriel Dos Reis <> | Date | 06 Jan 2002 21:37:59 +0100 |
| |
mike stump <mrs@windriver.com> writes:
| > From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com> | > Date: 06 Jan 2002 14:22:45 +0100 | | > Isn't the incriminated construct already outside of C and non-portable? | | That has been established and agreed upon. What we are now into is | pragmatics. You now have to argue why we should not provide this | feature in some form to users that ask for it.
Personnally, I don't have any sentiment against the assembler solution. Dewar said it was unnecessarily un-portable, but that the construct by itself *is* already unportable.
-- Gaby - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |