lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
From
Date
mike stump <mrs@windriver.com> writes:

| > From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@codesourcery.com>
| > Date: 06 Jan 2002 14:22:45 +0100
|
| > Isn't the incriminated construct already outside of C and non-portable?
|
| That has been established and agreed upon. What we are now into is
| pragmatics. You now have to argue why we should not provide this
| feature in some form to users that ask for it.

Personnally, I don't have any sentiment against the assembler
solution. Dewar said it was unnecessarily un-portable, but that the
construct by itself *is* already unportable.

-- Gaby
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.052 / U:1.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site