[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectIn kernel routing table vs. /sbin/ip vs. /sbin/route
Using /sbin/route, I can add multiple default routes like so:

/sbin/route add -net default gw
/sbin/route add -net default gw

But I cannot do the same with /sbin/ip:

/sbin/ip route add default via
/sbin/ip route add default via
RTNETLINK answers: File exists

Given that /sbin/ip is the more powerful and modern tool, I'm lead to
believe that /sbin/route might be leaving the in kernel routing table in a
weird state.

My two simple questions are as follows:

1) Which tool is more correct?

2) What is the behavior of the kernel when multiple default routes are



Dave Zarzycki

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean