[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernel patch support large fat partitions
Followup to:  <>
By author: Vijay Kumar <>
In newsgroup:
> Using 28bit cluster numbers and 65536 cluster size I could go upto 16TB
> which is lot more than what I wanted. So right now I have no problem with
> the on-disk format of a fat partition. Nevertheless with hard drives prices
> going down dramatically it may not be too long before we hit the limit.
> Regards,
> - Vijay

That's Microsoft's problem -- that's a fundamental limit of the format
they defined. The fact that they defined it in the first place is
part of the problem (the only way you can make a FAT filesystem work
*well* is by loading the entire FAT into memory ahead of time, and
"FAT32" breaks that), instead of creating a more sensible

(FWIW, the reason they used to justify FAT32 was "it would be too much
work to make DOS handle NTFS", as if those were the only options...)


<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." <>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.086 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site