[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler
    On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

    > > Ingo, you don't need that many queues, 32 are more than sufficent.
    > > If you look at the distribution you'll see that it matters ( for
    > > interactive feel ) only the very first ( top ) queues, while lower ones
    > > can very easily tollerate a FIFO pickup w/out bad feelings.
    > 64 queues costs a tiny amount more than 32 queues. If you can get it down
    > to eight or nine queues with no actual cost (espcially for non realtime queues)
    > then it represents a huge win since an 8bit ffz can be done by lookup table
    > and that is fast on all processors

    It's here that i want to go, but i'd liketo do it gradually :)

    unsigned char first_bit[255];

    - Davide

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.026 / U:52.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site