Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin | Date | Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:53:48 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> No you are wrong. This array is supposed to provide a readahead setting > on the driver level, which is bogous, since > it's something that *should* not be exposed to the upper layers at all.
Right.
> we have already max_readahead in struut block_device as well. Please > note that this array only has
Ok. Now I look at it again yes - the array is completely surplus to current requirements. 2.5 nicely sorts out the queues
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |