lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: A modest proposal -- We need a patch tracking system.
Date
Followup to:  <3C573428.3000404@fit.edu>
By author: Kervin Pierre <kpierre@fit.edu>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Public patch tracking system/queue, maybe something derived from bugzilla.
>
> (i) patches are sent to the maintainer and entered into the system.
>
> (ii) reviewed patches are update appropriately, eg. ( "reject - untidy,
> please fix", "accept - expected version 2.4.18pre19" etc. )
>
> (iii) patch versions, updates can be kept, as in mozilla's bugzilla
> site. And comments on that patch can also be kept right along side the
> code.
>
> Regardless of wether the current system is changed or not, the linux
> kernel would benefit from a central, searchable, public repository of
> patches.
>
> The code is available, bugzilla has all this functionality today.
>
> So here's hoping for a patchzilla.kernel.org :)
>

If Linus et al signs on to the idea, I'm sure we can build it...

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans