[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Note describing poor dcache utilization under high memory pressure
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On January 30, 2002 10:07 am, Horst von Brand wrote:

> > But most of this will be lost on exec(2).

> > Also, it is my impression that
> > the tree of _running_ processes isn't usually very deep (Say init --> X -->
> > [Random processes] --> [compilations &c], this would make 5 or 6 deep, no
> > more.

> Here's my tree - on a non-very-busy laptop. Why is my X tree so much deeper?
> I suppose if I was running java this would look considerably more interesting.

> |-bash---bash---xinit-+-XFree86
> | `-xfwm-+-xfce---gnome-terminal-+-bash---pstree

It doesn't matter how deep the tree is, on exec() all
previously shared page tables will be blown away.

In this part of the tree, I see exactly 2 processes
which could be sharing page tables (the two bash


"Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
-- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.084 / U:9.860 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site