Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin | Date | Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:14:49 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> How many other people are actually using bitkeeper already for the kernel? > I know the ppc guys have, for a long time, but who else is? bk, unlike > CVS, should at least be _able_ to handle a "network of people" kind of > approach.
I gave up on CVS for internal stuff with the -ac patches. I ended up keeping a running patch and a complete archive of the submissions. The archive so I can ensure info gets back and forth neatly.
(tangientially further)
Larry - can bitkeeper easily be persuaded to take "messages" back all the way to the true originator of a change. Ie if a diff gets to Linus he can reject a given piece of change and without passing messages back down the chain ensure they get the reply as to why it was rejected, and even if nobody filled anything in that it was looked at and rejected by xyz at time/date ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |