[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin
    On January 30, 2002 08:41 am, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
    > On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
    > > Exactly. The successor patch to the 'kind of gross' patch got rid of the
    > > double-pointers, it was the proper fix, though there is still no excuse for
    > > leaving the bug hanging around while coming up with the better version.
    > The gross fixes tend to get dropped because if they're in, the proper fix
    > loses priority. FIXMEs can take many years to fix. The problem seems not
    > to be the dropping of the patch so much as the dropping of the bug report
    > and bug tracking is an altogether different problem.

    The problem was the dropping of the patch. A bunch of things contributed
    to it, and at this point I believe the main one was having no patch
    submission system. I should know, I was on the dirty end of this stick.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.021 / U:30.304 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site