lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BKL in tty code?
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:25:59PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> It has less to do with lock contention and much more to do with the
> design of the tty / console layer. It isn't the kernel's prettiest
> code.
>
> There is probably some cleanup that is possible, but really getting the
> thing in gear (which means no BKL, which is probably the hardest part to
> rip out) require some level of rewrite.

I've been thinking about the serial layer, and its far from trivial.
Unless its done right, we'll end up with a mess of locks -> deadlock.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.092 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site