Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:45:14 -0500 (EST) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h |
| |
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> In article <E16M7Gz-00015E-00@starship.berlin> you wrote: > > - inode = get_empty_inode(); > > + inode = get_empty_inode(sb); > > How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead? > There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.
Seconded. However, you'll need to zero out ->i_dev for objects that traditionally have zero ->st_dev (pipes and sockets).
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |