lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Memory Hole on 2.4
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Vladimir Trebicky wrote:

> I want to upgrade from 2.2.16 to 2.4. I have Compaq Prosignia 300 with a
> memory hole, which cannot be turned off. There was no problem with that on
> 2.2.16, I just put "mem=64M" to kernel as a boot option. It does not appear
> to be functional on 2.4, I only finds 15MB. I use the same LILO v.21, rh6.2.

Well this is unrelated to your problem, but as a side-note: if you are
planning on using 2.4 going forward, you may need to upgrade some of your
OS-related tools like modutils, binutils, e2fsprogs, et al. Look in
Documentation/Changes.

Again, this has nothing to do with your current memory hole issues, but it
is something to consider if you solve your memory hole issues.

I seem to remember being able to map out ranges of memory either as
parameters to the kernel.. or by editing a source file--so that if you
know the linear address of the memory range you want to omit, you can do
so. Actually I think to do this you may need to modify one of the kernel
source files. If you are willing to do this write me back and I will try
hard and remember which file you have to modify...

-Calin

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.193 / U:0.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site