lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why 'linux/fs.h' cannot be included? I *can*...
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:51:43PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Your libc should provide a "sanitized" version of the kernel headers,
> > which is completely separate from any kernel sources.
> >
> > dietlibc does this... it's completely independent of kernel header changes.
> >
> > RedHat will be doing this with glibc in the future.
>
> We already do. Red Hat shipped since about 7.0 has a seperate set of
> kernel based headers that glibc uses for its own internal use, and the set
> in the kernel sources.

To clarify, Arjan said the headers were going to be further sanitized,
and less just simple copies of selected kernel headers... <cheer>

That's what I wanted to say, but -ENOCAFFEINE :)

Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:1.429 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site