Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:42:44 -0500 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: Why 'linux/fs.h' cannot be included? I *can*... |
| |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:51:43PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Your libc should provide a "sanitized" version of the kernel headers, > > which is completely separate from any kernel sources. > > > > dietlibc does this... it's completely independent of kernel header changes. > > > > RedHat will be doing this with glibc in the future. > > We already do. Red Hat shipped since about 7.0 has a seperate set of > kernel based headers that glibc uses for its own internal use, and the set > in the kernel sources.
To clarify, Arjan said the headers were going to be further sanitized, and less just simple copies of selected kernel headers... <cheer>
That's what I wanted to say, but -ENOCAFFEINE :)
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |