[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: question about sparc 64-bit user land
    Felix von Leitner wrote:
    > My understanding is that there is no 64-bit user land support for
    > UltraSPARC, although the kernel runs in 64-bit mode. Is that correct?
    > If yes: why is that (still) so?

    sparc64 has an in-kernel thunk layer that lets it run sparc32 binaries,
    and a sparc32 userland.

    Presumeably the standard benefits apply for 32 over 64 bits, such as
    lower I-cache usage and smaller programs overall. Though most
    Linux/Unix applications seem to work ok on 64-bit, (a) some don't and
    (b) few apps actually take good advantage of 64-bit machine int and
    address space.

    Of course, all that said, coming from an Alpha AXP background I prefer
    64-bit userland ;-)


    Jeff Garzik | "I went through my candy like hot oatmeal
    Building 1024 | through an internally-buttered weasel."
    MandrakeSoft | -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.022 / U:136.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site