Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 17:37:01 -0800 | From | J Sloan <> | Subject | Re: Testing the effects of the low latency patch |
| |
It was during gameplay, no dbench running, which as it turns out is a workload of interest for me -
Joe
Andrew Morton wrote:
>J Sloan wrote: > >>>>2.4.18-pre6+tux+nfs-fixes >>>>------------- >>>>... >>>>7.6 1 >>>>7.8 1 >>>>21.1 1 >>>> >>>This is the stock kernel. In twenty minutes you suffered >>>precisely *one* scheduling overrun which is perceptible >>>by a human. The rest are much shorter than your monitor's >>>refresh interval. Interesting, yes? >>> >>Yes, the stock kernel is much improved from >>say 6 months ago. I will take a look at the >>kernel that shipped with my distro just for >>giggles as well... >> > >Was you histogram generated during a game session, or during >dbench? write()-intensive workloads are the main common >offender. > >- >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |