lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Testing the effects of the low latency patch
It was during gameplay, no dbench running, which
as it turns out is a workload of interest for me -

Joe

Andrew Morton wrote:

>J Sloan wrote:
>
>>>>2.4.18-pre6+tux+nfs-fixes
>>>>-------------
>>>>...
>>>>7.6 1
>>>>7.8 1
>>>>21.1 1
>>>>
>>>This is the stock kernel. In twenty minutes you suffered
>>>precisely *one* scheduling overrun which is perceptible
>>>by a human. The rest are much shorter than your monitor's
>>>refresh interval. Interesting, yes?
>>>
>>Yes, the stock kernel is much improved from
>>say 6 months ago. I will take a look at the
>>kernel that shipped with my distro just for
>>giggles as well...
>>
>
>Was you histogram generated during a game session, or during
>dbench? write()-intensive workloads are the main common
>offender.
>
>-
>


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.109 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site