Messages in this thread |  | | From | Denis Vlasenko <> | | Subject | Re: force umount [was Re: [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002] | | Date | Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:00:12 -0200 |
| |
> > > Can I kill the processes accessing busy > > > filesystems? [That was big point of force umount, I believe.] > > > > Huh? If process is killable - it's killable. What does it have to > > --force? > > Following situation used to be common and "not a bug": > > process a tries to read /nfs/foo, but nfs server dies. > > kill -9 a does not kill a. > > It used to be "not a bug" before. Can we declare it a bug after umount > /nfs --force?
After more than a year on lkml I still don't understand why it's not a bug. Anyway, I always mount NFS with hard,intr and my processes are killable... -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |