[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: booleans and the kernel
    On Thu Jan 24, 2002 at 12:42:58PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > A small issue...
    > C99 introduced _Bool as a builtin type. The gcc patch for it went into
    > cvs around Dec 2000. Any objections to propagating this type and usage
    > of 'true' and 'false' around the kernel?
    > Where variables are truly boolean use of a bool type makes the
    > intentions of the code more clear. And it also gives the compiler a
    > slightly better chance to optimize code [I suspect].
    > Actually I prefer 'bool' to '_Bool', if this becomes a kernel standard.

    Agreed, bool is nicer. Out of curiosity, esp
    wrt struct packing, how does gcc actully store
    a bool? A single bit? A full 32-bit word?


    Erik B. Andersen
    --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.022 / U:95.824 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site