Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:55:17 -0500 (EST) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002 |
| |
On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > It's not a forced umount - it detaches the subtree from mountpoint and > > filesystem(s) go away when they stop being busy. But for remote > > filesystems that's precisely what you want. > > Can I umount filesystems below them?
Entire subtree gets umounted. Stuff that isn't busy gets shut down immediately, the rest - when it stops being busy.
> Can I reboot with > busy-but-detached filesystems?
You can, but if they are local you'll get dirty shutdown (if they are still busy at the time of reboot).
> Can I kill the processes accessing busy > filesystems? [That was big point of force umount, I believe.]
Huh? If process is killable - it's killable. What does it have to --force?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |