lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002


On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:

> > It's not a forced umount - it detaches the subtree from mountpoint and
> > filesystem(s) go away when they stop being busy. But for remote
> > filesystems that's precisely what you want.
>
> Can I umount filesystems below them?

Entire subtree gets umounted. Stuff that isn't busy gets shut down
immediately, the rest - when it stops being busy.

> Can I reboot with
> busy-but-detached filesystems?

You can, but if they are local you'll get dirty shutdown (if they are still
busy at the time of reboot).

> Can I kill the processes accessing busy
> filesystems? [That was big point of force umount, I believe.]

Huh? If process is killable - it's killable. What does it have to
--force?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.405 / U:0.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site