[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Why not "attach" patches?
Followup to:  <>
By author: Daniel Phillips <>
In newsgroup:
> Kmail's patch-mangling problems seem to be all gone in kmail 2.2+. The only
> thing to be careful about is that word wrap should be off. Since I
> forgot to
> turn it off a couple of times I now leave it permanently off and turn it on
> for individual mails as needed.

The common ground most people seems to be able to accept is:

a. Go ahead and make patches as attachments, if your MUA makes it easier;
b. Be bloody certain they're text/plain attachments.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." <>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.108 / U:1.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site