Messages in this thread | | | From | Adam Keys <> | Subject | Re: Performance Results for Ingo's O(1)-scheduler | Date | Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:55:32 -0600 |
| |
On January 21, 2002 06:03, Partha Narayanan wrote: > Here are some results from running VolanoMark on different > versions of O(1)-scheduler based on 2.4.17. > > VolanoMark 2.1.2 Loopback test, > 8-way 700MHZ Pentium III, > 1GB Kernel, > IBM JVM 1.3. (build cx 130 -20010626) > Throughput in msg/sec > > > KERNEL UP 4-way 8-way > ========= ====== ====== ====== > > 2.4.17 11005 15894 11595 > > 2.4.17 + D2 patch 10606 23300 29726 > > 2.4.17 + G1 patch 10415 23038 31098 > > 2.4.17 + H6 patch 10914 22270 32300 > > 2.4.17 + H7 patch 11018 23427 31674 > > 2.4.17 + J2 patch 13015 23071 33259
I'm curious about the performance of the 4-way and 8-way systems. I know nothing about this benchmark. IIRC correctly it simulates chat clients connecting to a server and talking to each other. Is it a CPU, memory, or disk bound benchmark? What is causing the 4-way machines to be only 2x the performance of the 1-way machine and the 8-way machines to be < 3x the performance? Is the system bus the limiting factor on those machines?
Curiosity aside, it looks like Ingo's scheduler is coming along nicely.
-- akk~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |