lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: ISA slot detection on PCI systems?
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Lionel Bouton wrote:

> > But this is not a bad reason. Allowing people to avoid running suid
> > programs is a *good* reason.
> Usually yes. But for a code that simply parses /dev/kmem content without
> taking args...
> Just took a quick look at dmidecode.c and auditing this code doesn't
> seem out of reach.

Exactly. And 90% of it can be ditched.

> What's the difference security-wise between running this code in kernel
> space and in a suid prog? Avoiding loading libraries?
> Frankly I don't see the point.

*shrug* about the same point as having a /proc/acpi/dsdt I'd guess.
(Which worked fine as a run-as-root program called acpidmp, but
for some reason someone thought it'd be good to dump in /proc)

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.346 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site