lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:44:35PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:35:57PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > That's not really an option.
>
> Oh come on. It shouldn't take very much code at all to properly
> relocate the binary. You can use either -fpic or -mrelocatable
> to get hold of the set of addresses in question.

Have you looked at all of the code in question? We're doing a lot of things
before we properly relocate ourself. And as long as things aren't being
optimized away, it just works.

And the other thing is if we want gcc-3.0 to produce a good kernel on
PPC in 2.4.x, the kernel-side changes should be as minimal as possible.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.183 / U:1.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site