lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] C undefined behavior fix
From
Date
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> writes:

Paul> Tom Rini writes:

>> Okay, here's a summary of all of the options we have:
>> 1) Change this particular strcpy to a memcpy
>> 2) Add -ffreestanding to the CFLAGS of arch/ppc/kernel/prom.o (If this
>> optimization comes back on with this flag later on, it would be a
>> compiler bug, yes?)
>> 3) Modify the RELOC() marco in such a way that GCC won't attempt to
>> optimize anything which touches it [1]. (Franz, again by Jakub)
>> 4) Introduce a function to do the calculations [2]. (Corey Minyard)
>> 5) 'Properly' set things up so that we don't need the RELOC() macros
>> (-mrelocatable or so?), and forget this mess altogether.

Paul> I would add:

Paul> 6) change strcpy to string_copy so gcc doesn't think it knows what the
Paul> function does

GCC thinks exactly what the function does.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.287 / U:4.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site