[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: highmem and usb [was "sr: unaligned transfer" in 2.5.2-pre1]
On Wed, Jan 02 2002, David Brownell wrote:
> > > requirement for drivers is that the transfer buffers can be passed to
> > > pci_map_single() calls by the Host Controller Drivers (HCDs). The
> > > device drivers, and URBs, don't expose such mappings, they only
> > > require that they can be created/destroyed.
> >
> > .. which is the requirement that you want to change to use pci_map_page
> > or pci_map_sg
> OK, I think I'm clear on this much then: in 2.5, to support block drivers
> over USB (usb-storage only, for now) there needs to be an addition to
> the buffer addressing model in usbcore, as exposed by URBs.
> - Current "transfer_buffer" + "transfer_buffer_length" mode needs to
> stay, since most drivers aren't block drivers.

Why? Surely USB block drivers are not the only ones that want to support

> - Add some kind of "page + offset" addressing model.


> Discussion of details can be taken off LKML, it'd seem. Though I'm
> curious when the scatterlist->address field will vanish, making these
> changes a requirement. Is that a 2.5.2 thing?

Maybe 2.5.3, dunno for sure.

> Also, I noticed that include/asm-sparc/pci.h doesn't include the
> standard pci_map_page() call ... what's up with that? That surely
> causes portability problems.

It probably isn't up to snuff yet.

Jens Axboe

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.163 / U:0.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site