lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [STATUS 2.5] January 18, 2002


On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jakob ьstergaard wrote:

> > All this seems very neat. One question: what about forced umount / forced
> > remount readonly stuff? Any plans on that?
> >
>
> That would be *very* nice indeed. Even if it was only for things like NFS
> and SMBFS.

umount(mountpoint, MNT_DETACH);

Had been there for quite a while...

It's not a forced umount - it detaches the subtree from mountpoint and
filesystem(s) go away when they stop being busy. But for remote
filesystems that's precisely what you want.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.102 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site