[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: vm philosophising

On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Tommy Faasen wrote:

> I have no clue about VM's but I can imagine that for example the following situations have different requirements:
> 1-Desktop: many "small" apps, I believe exe's remain in memory and data is written to disk? Anyway I can imagine fragmentation and latency is an issue here.
> 2-DBMS: 1 or 2 big programs which sometimes even do their own memory management.Fragmentation and latency isn't issue here I think however moving ltos of data to and from swap is.
> 3-Webserver: for example apache with many childs being created under high load and killed under low load. The data is always small (in case of static pages). So a lot of small swaps? Latency is not as much as un issue but I can imagine that fragmentation can be an issue?

There is another situation to consider which I think more typical in the
"Real World"

4 - The Typical Web server Environment, in many many companies that I have
The machine runs both the DBMS(mysql, Oracle, etc) and the web server
Apache. Therefore a balence of memory use needs to be struck between the
two applications. Then ususally the system also has a development
environment at the ready incase changes need to be made quickly from the
console. While this may not be true as things scale up for a business and
functions get separated to different machines. Many startups and small
businesses that I have worked with that have turned to LINUX for the OS
becuase the TCO, it offers over the other guys, tend to have just that
single does everything box.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.129 / U:1.900 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site