Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: FC & MULTIPATH !? (any hope?) | From | Brian Beattie <> | Date | 18 Jan 2002 14:30:11 -0800 |
| |
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 23:07, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2002-01-17T15:36:54, > Brian Beattie <alchemy@us.ibm.com> said: > > > Probable enhancements to this would include, provideing a method to mark > > a path to not attempt this crude form of auto recovery and a way to mark > > a failed path as good. Finally a device wide flag to disable > > auto-recovery. ... > > Combined with the enhancements this makes a lot of sense. > > The enhancements are very much required, especially the way to mark a path as > good again manually. > > I would also liks easily parseable /proc file to query the status of a > multi-path device, including all paths associated with it. > > I have some stuff that uses sysctl, which shows in /proc/sys/... that I was planning to use.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |