lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: FC & MULTIPATH !? (any hope?)
From
Date
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 23:07, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2002-01-17T15:36:54,
> Brian Beattie <alchemy@us.ibm.com> said:
>
> > Probable enhancements to this would include, provideing a method to mark
> > a path to not attempt this crude form of auto recovery and a way to mark
> > a failed path as good. Finally a device wide flag to disable
> > auto-recovery.
...
>
> Combined with the enhancements this makes a lot of sense.
>
> The enhancements are very much required, especially the way to mark a path as
> good again manually.
>
> I would also liks easily parseable /proc file to query the status of a
> multi-path device, including all paths associated with it.
>
>
I have some stuff that uses sysctl, which shows in /proc/sys/... that I
was planning to use.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.049 / U:4.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site