[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 1-2-3 GB
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > The patch below seems to be enough to convince egcs-2.91.66 and
> > gcc-2.95.3 to use a "jb" comparison there. I'm working on PIII,
> > prefetchw() just a stub, if that makes any difference.
> If this is really gcc bug, would simply making j volatile fix it?

You rogue! The panacea, eh? Well, yes, it does look like that's
enough with egcs-2.91.66 (I don't have 2.95 here to try at the moment,
expect it would behave the same) - the comparison uses "jle" as before,
but now it's correctly on free_one_pmd's index j instead of an address.
Neat - but an even bigger fatter comment needed?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.080 / U:1.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site