[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: hashed waitqueues
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Regardless, various arches want non-multiplicative hash functions and
> they'll be getting them. These hash functions will certainly prove
> useful in getting a broader base to test against. I don't care to have
> a "pet" hash function, only one that is good as possible.

Take a look at these too. Not much information about how good they are,
but they do provide yet more examples to test, if you're testing.

-- Jamie
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.035 / U:6.576 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site