lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions.
From
Date
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:16:55 -0500 (EST), Richard B Johnson wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>> > > What's the point of optimizing an IF to a cmov if I have
>> > > to insert another IF to see if I can use cmov?
>> >
>> > I've always wondered. Intel made the instruction optional yet there isnt
>> > an obvious way to do runtime fixups on it
>>
>> Yes there is -- emulation! :-)
>>

> It's just as bad, probably worse! You trap on an invalid op-code. The
> trap-handler checks the op-code and if it's emulated, it emulates it
> and returns to the executing task. This takes many instruction cycles,
> certainly more than `if(cmov) doit; else do_something_else;` --which,
> itself, takes many more instruction cycles than cmov is supposed to
> reduce. It's a no-win situation. The only way to win is a compile-time
> choice. This means customizing for your CPU IFF it has the cmov
> instruction.

It is a big win in the situation where you have only a binary for i686
and want or better must execute it e.g. on a i586. This was the reason
why I asked initially.

ron

--
/\/\ Dipl.-Inf. Ronald Wahl /\/\ C S N /\/\
\/\/ ronald.wahl@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \/\/ ------------------ \/\/
/\/\ http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~row/ /\/\ network and system /\/\
\/\/ GnuPG/PGP key available \/\/ administration \/\/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:23    [W:0.119 / U:0.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site