lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Why not "attach" patches?
Linus Torvalds writes:
> In article <3C446C77.3000806@evision-ventures.com>,
> Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:
> >
> >Don't worry - nothign prevents proper attached patches from beeing
> >applied - the FAQ is only a bit zealous on this ;-)
>
> Wrong.
>
> If I get a patch in an attachment (other than a "Text/PLAIN" type
> attachment with no mangling and that pretty much all mail readers and
> all tools will see as a normal body), I simply WILL NOT apply it unless
> I have strong reason to. I usually wont even bother looking at it,
> unless I expected something special from the sender.
>
> Really. Don't send patches as attachments.

Thanks for providing material I can quote :-) I've updated the FAQ
entry on this, and also included your sage words:
http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s1-14

"So let it be written, so let it be done!" :-)

Regards,

Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:23    [W:0.090 / U:5.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site