Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:06:20 -0800 (PST) | From | David Lang <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] klibc requirements |
| |
On 15 Jan 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:
> > > as an example (not for the boot process, but an example of a replacement > > libc use) I use the firewall toolkit, it has been around for a _loooong_ > > time (in software terms anyway) and has a firly odd licence (free for you > > to use, source available, cannot sell it) which is not compatable with the > > GPL. with glibc staticly linked this makes huge binaries, with libc5 they > > were a lot smaller. I would like to try to use this small libc for these > > proxies, but if the library is GPL, not LGPL I'm not allowed to. > > Hmm, I think you can; you just can't redistribute it. Can you even > redistribute fwtk on non-commercial terms? > nope, only allowed to get it from nai (and they sure don't make it easy to find on their website)
David Lang
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |