[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] klibc requirements
On 15 Jan 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:

> > as an example (not for the boot process, but an example of a replacement
> > libc use) I use the firewall toolkit, it has been around for a _loooong_
> > time (in software terms anyway) and has a firly odd licence (free for you
> > to use, source available, cannot sell it) which is not compatable with the
> > GPL. with glibc staticly linked this makes huge binaries, with libc5 they
> > were a lot smaller. I would like to try to use this small libc for these
> > proxies, but if the library is GPL, not LGPL I'm not allowed to.
> Hmm, I think you can; you just can't redistribute it. Can you even
> redistribute fwtk on non-commercial terms?
nope, only allowed to get it from nai (and they sure don't make it easy to
find on their website)

David Lang

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:23    [W:0.053 / U:1.840 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site