[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: highmem=system killer, 2.2.17=performance killer ?
Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 04:13:49 +0100
> Klaus Meyer <> wrote:
> > i've got serious problems using 2.4.x kernels using highmem support.
> > It seems to me that i'm not the only one, but the difference to most
> > other ones is,
> > that i can't use highmem because the system performance is terrible
> > slow.
> >
> > the testbed:
> > 1) Asus CUR-DLS (Server Set LE III) with two 1Ghz Pentiums, 2GB of ram
> Interestingly I have about the same setup and use, only I transfer about 25 GB
> a day via nfs to an Asus CUV4XD with 2 GB under 2.4.18-pre3 and do not
> experience any problem so far. I haven't had any with 2.4.17, too. Cache is
> pretty heavy used, but I experience no slowdown or other weird things. Can this
> be somehow chipset related? Maybe something about the DGE cards? I am using TP
> 100MBit tulip-based.

I dont think that the network driver is the one who causes problems,
because the throughput is very nice, if i limit the memory to 1GB by
if files are in the cache I'm even getting a throughput of nearly 60
MB/S (using udp) !
(but sorry, not with kernel 2.2.17 => network throuput decreases
The whole system is running quite stable and pretty fast using only 1GB
of mem.
Probably somebody can explain the difference what will happen if i have
a kernel
with highmem support (4GB or 64GB) compiled in, but using only 1GB of
physically 2GB?
Is the kernel aware how to use highmem in this case ?
it seems to be that only a small amount of highmem will be used in this

cat /proc/meminfo reads:
HighTotal: 131072 kB
HighFree: 115628

As I just took a look on the output of cat /proc/meminfo i got the idea
that i'll increase the pysical swap space. (136M before that means >
astonishing (using Suse kernel 2.4.16): after an increase to 2GB swap
using 1,5GB of mem the system runs quit a longer time with a good
but starting the copy process leads also to a slow down of the machine.
Finally i could see that kupdated is suffering.

5:56pm up 2 min, 1 user, load average: 2.97, 1.02, 0.36
34 processes: 29 sleeping, 5 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU0 states: 2.5% user, 96.0% system, 0.0% nice, 1.0% idle
CPU1 states: 11.4% user, 95.0% system, 0.0% nice, -6.-5% idle
Mem: 1545456K av, 452480K used, 1092976K free, 0K shrd, 19708K
Swap: 2097136K av, 0K used, 2097136K free 400732K

7 root 15 0 0 0 0 RW 81.2 0.0 0:44

As kupdated finished his work, the system was quite usefull and came
back to a
much more better performance.

Using the avail. 2 GB of ram led to the same effect.

So whats the relation between physical swap space and highmem and
physical memory
(and the chipset) ?

testing this configuration with the offical kernel 2.4.17 falls back to
the known slow down.

It seems to be Suse has applied some patches or back porting ?!?

regards, Klaus
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:23    [W:0.058 / U:8.408 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site