lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: slowdown with new scheduler.
From
Date
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 17:40, Heinz Diehl wrote:

> > After that you should apply preempt+locl-break or LL to both.
>
> The same here, lock-break does not apply to 2.4.18-pre3+H7 without
> some failed hunks....

Just a note, if lock-break fails in chunks it is probably OK to just
ignore them. Each lock-break is independent so, while it is less lock
breaking, it is nearly the same and certainly works fine.

Wouldn't give the same advice for rmap, however. Best to make sure your
VM applies cleanly :)

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.041 / U:2.904 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site