[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Penelope builds a kernel
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 06:39:54PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:

> Wrong. She needs to compile a new module for her kernel. What might be
> useful is some automagic tool that will find the vendor-provided kernel
> source tree and config (which is usually /boot/config-`uname -r`, but
> still findable anyhow)

autoconf code already exists for this, it's a non-problem. Note they must use
the config in the header file of the vendor-provided kernel source tree, not
/boot/config-`uname -r`

There are two cases:

1) the vendor source tree is installed and set up with the right config -> use header file

2) it's installed and the config has changed. -> use header file

I don't see a point in ever looking at /boot/config-`uname -r` instead of
the source tree, given that we must compile against a tree configured like the
eventual running kernel anyway.


"Now why did you have to go and mess up the child's head, so you can get another gold waterbed ?
You fake-hair contact-wearing liposuction carnival exhibit, listen to my rhyme ..."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.250 / U:2.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site