[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Penelope builds a kernel
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 07:50:53PM -0500, Nathan Walp wrote:

> She can't very well patch her vendor kernel, because I sincerely doubt
> the patch will apply cleanly, if this driver is such that it needs a
> patch as opposed to just a module.

If it needs a patch, it's messing with kernel internals and she certainly shouldn't
be trying it without an awareness of the potential interactions, or a "recommended
version" from the patch vendor. So if she needs a really stable configuration,
she needs to punt the problem to departmental support.

If it doesn't need a patch, the sensible and proper solution is to autoconfize the
external module source tree, which can adapt itself to different kernels correctly.

autoconfigure of kernel will definitely be useful to e.g. the users we see in
#kernelnewbies, but it is /not/ the right solution for Tilly, Penelope, Dick Dastardly
or any other of the Wacky Races crew Eric is talking about.


"Now why did you have to go and mess up the child's head, so you can get another gold waterbed ?
You fake-hair contact-wearing liposuction carnival exhibit, listen to my rhyme ..."
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.096 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site