Messages in this thread | | | From | Dieter Nützel <> | Subject | Re: slowdown with new scheduler. | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 22:08:23 +0100 |
| |
On Monday, 14. January 2002 20:42, you wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:29:25PM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote: > > On Mon Jan 14 2002, Heinz Diehl wrote: > > > > > 2.4.18-pre3 real 7m55.243s > > > user 6m34.080s > > > sys 0m27.610s > > > > > > 2.4.18-pre+H7 real 7m35.962s > > > user 6m34.270s > > > sys 0m27.700s > > > > > > 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 real 7m39.203s > > > user 6m34.110s > > > sys 0m28.740s > > > > > > > 2.4.18-pre3+H7+preempt-rml real 6m58.983s > > user 6m34.500s > > sys 0m27.820s > > > That sounds very good! But what about the VM code? > Is the VM in 2.4.18-pre3+H7 as good as in 2.4.18-pre2aa2?
Of course _NOT_. This is like apples and oranges...
You _must_ compare 2.4.18-pre3+H7+ -aa vm-22 from 2.4.18-pre2aa2 with 2.4.18-pre3+H7+ -rmap
After that you should apply preempt+locl-break or LL to both.
Have a look into Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
Greetings, Dieter -- Dieter Nützel Graduate Student, Computer Science
University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |