Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:42:03 +0100 | Subject | Re: slowdown with new scheduler. | From | Banai Zoltan <> |
| |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 08:29:25PM +0100, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On Mon Jan 14 2002, Heinz Diehl wrote: > > > 2.4.18-pre3 real 7m55.243s > > user 6m34.080s > > sys 0m27.610s > > > > 2.4.18-pre+H7 real 7m35.962s > > user 6m34.270s > > sys 0m27.700s > > > > 2.4.18-pre3-ac2 real 7m39.203s > > user 6m34.110s > > sys 0m28.740s > > > > 2.4.18-pre3+H7+preempt-rml real 6m58.983s > user 6m34.500s > sys 0m27.820s > That sounds very good! But what about the VM code? Is the VM in 2.4.18-pre3+H7 as good as in 2.4.18-pre2aa2? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |