[lkml]   [2002]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable
On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 10:02, J.A. Magallon wrote:

> Yup. That remind me of...
> Would there be any kernel call every driver is doing just to hide there
> a conditional_schedule() so everyone does it even without knowledge of it ?
> Just like Apple put the SystemTask() inside GetNextEvent()...

It's not nearly that easy. If it were, we would all certainly switch to
the preemptive kernel design, and preempt whenever and wherever we

Instead, we have to worry about reentrancy and thus can not preempt
inside critical regions (denoted by spinlocks). So we can't have
preempt there, and have more work to do -- thus this discussion.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:15    [W:0.322 / U:3.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site